JavaOne Weblog Gathering [MetaBlog] Hint: Never assume scheduling something during JavaOne week will be easy! To dovetail with (amongst other things) the JXTA/JCP Town Hall scheduled for 7pm I have arranged that we can meet on-site at Moscone instead of out at the hotel. Negative: No budget-busting martinis while we wait; Positive: Still sober by the time we make the Thirsty Bear, plus all the people who have said they will come can still make it :-)
So the details are:
Date is Thursday, June 12, 2003
Gathering point is Esplanade 306 in Moscone
Meeting time is loosely 8:30pm
Once we have critical mass we'll head on out to a suitable watering hole (likely the Bear)
If you won't be registered for JavaOne let me know and I'll try to find a way to get you in just for this
The ironic thing about this is that while software patents are problematic for small software companies, they will likely have the end effect of causing Richard Stallman's dream world to arrive.
Jazz Guitar [Music]
It must be something to do with turning 42 - the jazz guitar is getting to me. I really love Pat Metheny's new solo album 'One Quiet Night' [UK|US], which arrived Wednesday and has been playing near continuously. It's just Metheny playing new and favourite music on his new baritone guitar, quite unlike what BBC reviewer Peter Marsh calls "the airbrushed sheen of the Pat Metheny Group." (which I also love).
Wistful, peaceful, tonally rich, the music is perfect calming therapy. The range of the custom-tuned baritone guitar means there's a bass accompaniment to the melody, and even the track "Ferry Cross the Mersey" is delicious rather than out of place. As the BBC reviewer says,
Late at night, with the rain beating against the windows, this is the kind of record that can send you to bed feeling that all's right with the world. In times like these, that's no bad thing.
This isn't more 'Smooth Jazz' - this is heartfelt virtuosity.
The excellent Norah Jones also receives an accolade that I assume will thrill her. Metheny performs a very pleasant cover of 'I don't know why' from her album. My son just bought a copy of the Pat Metheny Group album 'American Garage' (on vinyl) from the Oxfam shop today and it's dated 1979, just to give you an idea how long Metheny has been a modern jazz master. But best of all (for Norah), Metheny's sleeve notes suggest this is now one of his three all-time favourite songs.
Open Source Microsoft? [WebTech]
Robert Scoble wonders if the expanding scope of source code access means Microsoft is 'going open source' in some way. Well, all I can say is substitute the phrase "open source" with its synonym "commons-based peer production" [Benkler] and see if you still think it.
No, what we are seeing is a harking back to the early days of the software industry, when large corporate customers who posed no competitive risk were given locked-down source access to help them deploy and support their systems more effectively. This practice was just ending when I entered the industry. It's source code to learn from, not to contribute to or build with, and that's why it's not "open source".
posted at 12:45 AM (UK) | Comment? (0 so far)
|
links to this post
| |
Wednesday, June 4
Objective secured, troops withdraw [WebTech]
So what's happening at Microsoft over their Internet Explorer browser? You may recall that the IE Product Manager let slip during a webcast the idea that IE is dead as an independent entity, and since then Microsoft has been out to lunch on the subject - even Robert would prefer not to comment. If I had to guess, this was part of an exercise to wave a flag over the edge of the trench and see who shoots at it.
Personally I have never doubted that IE was a tactical response to a deadly market trend which, once the trend was controlled, would no longer be needed. Presumably the AOL settlement (which looks more like AOL making restitution to MSFT than the other way round) means that that's the case on the monopoly desktop, and that fighting on the marginal desktop (Mac, Linux, old Windows) is no longer deemed cost effective. There's more analysis in Jupiter's new Microsoft Monitor Blog, but I'm assuming the "saw it coming" response is being received loud and clear.
posted at 4:10 PM (UK) | Comment? (0 so far)
|
links to this post
| |
JavaOne Meeting [MetaBlog] Updated: I'll be at JavaOne off and on next week and a few folks on the Webmink comment list suggest a gathering. I've not instantly found discussion of a webloggers gathering at JavaOne so let's see if we can seed one. How about (after the Attendee Reception on Monday evening) Thursday evening around 8:30pm? I'd suggest the W Hotel lobby as a gathering place, See new details above for assembly point, with migration to the Thirsty Bear afterwards.
Update: Of course, my hamster-powered blog has no trackbacks so I'll try to do 'em manually for this one. Apologies if I miss your posting - RSVP if you have no blog or don't show up below.
Alan Williamson is coming (non Java bloggers and Java non-bloggers also welcome!).
posted at 1:02 PM (UK) | Comment? (0 so far)
|
links to this post
| |
Capping Copyright [SocioPolitico]
Clearly not one to give up despite taking defeat in the US Supreme Court very hard, Lawrence Lessig is now promoting the Eric Eldred Act in the US. Despite the distasteful appeal to "spam" the issue, I think the online petition is well worth signing and hope all my American friends will do so! Meanwhile, is anyone working on a European equivalent?
posted at 12:38 PM (UK) | Comment? (0 so far)
|
links to this post
| |
Reluctant freeloader [Music]
Buying music over the internet isn't an especially new thing. One of my most treasured CDs is one I bought years and years ago direct from the record label using CompuServe. Now sadly deleted, the album is by the great jazz guitarist Emily Remler, who created some of the most delicious jazz in her short life. I've wanted to complete my catalogue of her music for ages, but it can be hard to find all the albums.
So imagine my delight when I visited EMusic on Tuesday evening and found that they had almost her whole catalogue online as MP3s. The big problem with EMusic is their subscription model. I'm sure there are many people who enjoy their whole catalogue of alternative performers and are pleased to pay $14.99/month for a minimum of 3 months for unlimited downloads, but I'm not one of them. I just wanted Emily's music.
Fortunately, EMusic have an offer allowing free download of up to 50 tracks, and omitting the albums I already own that allowed me to download all of the Emily Remler I needed. I would gladly have paid them for it but there was just no way to do it without taking an open-ended subscription commitment. So I gratefully accepted their '50 free' offer, downloaded the music and then cancelled my subscription.
Am I the only one in this position, or will EMusic change their model now they finally have some decent competition from the brilliant-but-flawed iTunes?
posted at 12:31 PM (UK) | Comment? (0 so far)
|
links to this post
| |
Distracted by the good? [PhotoTravel] As I mentioned earlier, all the family came with me to Copenhagen this week, where I was speaking at Dansk IT's annual conference - my topic was open source software. We found Copenhagen a beautiful, light and gracious city, with a population of largely gentle and charming people. I should probably post some of the other photos we took but instead here's the famous sculpture of 'The Little Mermaid'. Many Danes we met cringe to see this as the icon of their capital city, as it is a small and undistingished artefact at the periphery of the place, but it provides an interesting object lesson that I believe the open source community would do well to learn.
By using it as a token of the city, people largely forget that the place has over a thousand years of history, three magnificent royal palaces, the world's first 'theme park', eclectic and excellent dining and many other qualities. So too, by carping on about licenses and no-cost software, the open source movement has distracted the casual observer from the real qualities that make open source the future - great, more secure software, built by professional engineers in a collaborative way that fits more people's needs, and with the costs distributed and indirectly channelled.
Just as Copenhagen's statue was a good addition to their heritage but has become a burden, so maybe the phrase 'open source' is due for replacement, having served us all well for five years? Professor Benkler's [via Lessig] phrase "commons-based peer-production" says it well but is hardly snappy. Once people grasp the core of the concept, they often have an aha! moment. We need a new phrase that will prevent detractors from focussing on the ephemeral.
posted at 7:14 PM (UK) | Comment? (0 so far)
|
links to this post
| |
For older items see the archives. When commenting, please respect the house rules.
(c) 2003-7, Simon Phipps. Some items may be repeated in the editorial column on the home page.